Regulation and Ethical approaches (V1501), 5 cr

                                                                                                                      1/2
Implementation plan Finished



 Study unit                            Regulation and Ethical approaches (V1501), 5.0
 Implementation                        SYV61611: 1/2016-2017 (29.08.2016 - 23.12.2016)
 Type                                  GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE (V097)
 Groups                                Primary: SYV616SJ Others :
 Involved in the project
 Lecturers                             Teija-Kaisa AHolaakko, Henna Närhi
 Number of participants                Minimum: 12 Maximum: 35
 Enrolment period                      16.05.2016 08:00 - 31.05.2016
 Main timing for implementation        According to a schedule agreed by the parties
 Applicabililty                        For exchange students: Yes For elective studies: No Open UAS student:
                                       Yes Suitable for virtual UAS: Yes

 Teachers                              Aholaakko Teija-Kaisa (Teacher in charge)
 Campus                                Laurea Tikkurila
 Main location for implementation      Virtually
 Implementation method                 Optima realization/student group, Web/virtual Language: English Virtuality:
                                       3 cr Integration of R&D: 1 cr
 Implementation class
 Focus areas                           Expertise in nursing and coping at home
 Evaluation at the latest              23.01.2017 Storing of graded material ends.: 23.12.2017
 Exam days

 Having completed the study unit the   ●      to critically analyze ethical and legal issues in global health care
 student is able to                    ●      to progress legal performance of global health care
                                       ●      to progress ethical performance of global health care
 Previous studies
 Evaluation criteria and methods       EVALUATOR: Teija-Kaisa AholaakkoEVALUATION OF CASE STUDY: Focus
                                       of assessment: Knowledge baseExcellent (5)Good (3)Satisfactory (1)You managed
                                       well in /

                                       Improve your assignment by

                                       The student is able To create a consistent framework/knowledge base making use of
                                       both national and international scientific sources in a critical analyticfashion.To gather,
                                       process, produce and evaluate information critically and widely making use of both
                                       national and international scientificsources. To use concepts of the area of expertise
                                       fairly.To gather, process, produce and evaluate information widely.To use concepts of
                                       the area of expertise systematically.

                                       Problem solving:Excellent (5)Good (3)Satisfactory (1)You managed well in /

                                       Improve your assignment by

                                       The student is able To solve demanding problems in research, development and/or
                                       innovation activities where new knowledge and competence is created as well as to
                                       apply and combine information from different fields.To solve problems in research,
                                       development and/or innovation activities by applying and combining information from
                                       different fields.To solve problems in research, development and/or innovation activities.


                                       Development:Excellent (5)Good (3)Satisfactory (1)You managed well in /Improve


SoleOPS 3.5.5 Study offer © 2005-2016 Solenovo Oy
                                                                                                                 2/2
Implementation plan Finished



                                 your assignment by

                                 The student is able To develop the activities of the competence area in a target-oriented
                                 and communal fashion.To create target-oriented, justified development plans
                                 considering the community.To recognise and analyse focuses of development making
                                 use of the knowledge base.

                                 Communication:Excellent (5)Good (3)Satisfactory (1)You managed well in
                                 /Improve your assignment by

                                 The student is able To communicate convincingly both orally and in writing to
                                 audiences within and exterior to the field.To communicate in a competent, clear and
                                 consistent manner both orally and in writing.To communicate clearly both orally and in
                                 writing.

                                 The nine- step model1. The morally relevant facts of the case were reported.

                                 2. The reasoning of the relevance of the ethical facts was completed.Moral principles,
                                 theories and/or concepts motivated the determination of what was considered morally
                                 relevant.The motivating implicit and explicit values were present.

                                 3.The ethical issues inherent in the case were priorised -the most morally relevant issues
                                 were recognised? The motivators of decisions (principles, values etc.) were introduced.

                                 4. The possibly conflicting ethical considerations were described and the conflict
                                 solvingwas discussed.

                                 5. The bearingof moral psychology was discussed. For example the intent that lies
                                 behind the moral reasoning was discussed.

                                 6. Once the above was worked through,the views changed in terms of what is morally
                                 relevant about the case was discussed.

                                 7. The discussion /dialogue with the community involved includedthe author's view on
                                 the case.

                                 8. How did the role / organisational-specific authority (e.g. legal medical professional)
                                 impact on the way in which the authoradjudicated the case was discussed was discussed.
                                 Alike what bearing might this have on how approach the above, particularly number 7.

                                 9. The discussion included reflection of particularly global issues that were arisen in the
                                 analysis. If so,the morally relevant aspects of this global dimensions were
                                 identified. These issues arising were discussed at the personal, health system, population
                                 and/or global levels.




SoleOPS 3.5.5 Study offer © 2005-2016 Solenovo Oy